Analysis of Alternatives and Strategy Choice
13
May
2020
Strategic alternatives analysis compares two to four realistic growth paths against the same criteria: market, resources, risk and time to results. The choice comes after a SWOT analysis and a competitor review.
In short
- An alternative is a concrete path: which product, for which segment, through which channels, with which team.
- Two core frameworks: the Ansoff matrix (where to grow) and Porter's generic strategies (how to compete).
- Options are compared with weighted criteria. The decision is written down with the conditions for revisiting it.
- Before large investments, test the strategy small: a landing page in 3 working days plus an ad campaign.
What is strategic alternatives analysis?
It is the planning step between diagnosis and the action plan. Inputs are the results of a strengths and weaknesses analysis, market data and competitor data. The output is one chosen strategy and clear reasons why the others were set aside.
Alternatives exist at three levels. Corporate: which markets and products to enter. Business: how to compete. Functional: how marketing, sales and operations will support the choice.
What types of growth strategy are there?
Most options fit the Ansoff matrix:
| Existing products | New products | |
|---|---|---|
| Existing markets | Market penetration: sell more to current customers and lookalikes | Product development: a new offer for your customers |
| New markets | Market development: new regions, countries, segments | Diversification: a new product in a new market, the riskiest path |
The second question is how to compete. Michael Porter described three generic approaches: cost leadership, differentiation and focus on a narrow segment. Companies that try to do all three usually lose to those that pick one.
There are also strategies by pace: stability, growth and retrenchment. Retrenchment makes sense when some business lines consume resources without paying back.
How do you build the alternatives?
Describe each alternative on one card: product, target segment, key difference, sales channels, people and budget needed, and the first measurable result. Two cards on the same theme mean the option is not thought through yet.
- Demand data: Google Trends, Google Ads Keyword Planner, Search Console.
- Competitor data: their websites, ads in Meta Ad Library and Google Ads Transparency Center, reviews.
- Internal data: margin by product, CRM records, repeat sales.
More on methods in our article on company competitiveness analysis.
Which criteria should drive the choice?
A weighted score works best. The team rates each option from 1 to 5 on every criterion, multiplies by the weight and adds up.
| Criterion | The question |
|---|---|
| Fit with goals | Does it move us toward the 1–3 year goal? |
| Market | Is there demand, and can we reach it? |
| Resources | Do we have the money, people and skills? |
| Risk | What do we lose if it fails? |
| Time | When will we see the first measurable result? |
| Reversibility | Can we stop without heavy losses? |
Scores keep the debate factual. The owner still makes the final call. Record it together with the conditions that trigger a review.
How do you test a strategy before investing heavily?
Test demand with a small experiment. We launch a landing page for a new offer within 3 working days after the brief is approved and materials are received. A Google Ads or Meta Ads campaign goes live a few working days after we get account access.
Two to four weeks of testing give you first leads, cost per enquiry and real customer questions. That is enough to decide whether to scale the option or go back to the alternatives table.
What does this look like in practice?
In our marketing strategy case for a motorcycle taxi service in Istanbul, the team went through the full path: market analysis, SWOT, competitors, positioning, then a promotion plan with separate tasks for attracting drivers and passengers. Because the strategy rested on analysis, every task had a clear purpose.
Frequently asked questions
How many alternatives should you consider?
Usually two to four. With fewer than two there is no choice. With more than four the comparison drags on and the decision keeps slipping.
How is the Ansoff matrix different from Porter's strategies?
The Ansoff matrix answers where to grow: which products and markets. Porter's strategies answer how to beat competitors in the chosen market.
Who should take part in choosing a strategy?
The owner and the heads of sales, marketing and finance. An outside consultant helps collect data and keeps the discussion tied to the criteria.
How often should a strategy be reviewed?
A full review once a year and a KPI review every quarter. An unscheduled review is due when the market, regulation or a key resource changes.
What if no option scores high enough?
Go back to the data. The usual cause is a vague segment description or an underestimated resource need. Refine the cards, collect the missing numbers and score again with the same team.
Can you choose a strategy without market research?
You can, but the risk of error is higher. At a minimum, use Google demand data, a review of three to five competitors and your own CRM sales.
Choose your strategy based on data
We collect market and competitor data, shape the alternatives and help you pick one. See marketing strategy development and market analysis.
Contact us
We will answer all your questions.

Comments
Write comment